For photographs to be admissible in court, they must meet which criteria?

Photographs used as evidence in court must satisfy specific criteria to ensure their reliability and usefulness in conveying information. The requirement of true representation and relevance is crucial because it confirms that the photograph accurately depicts what it is intended to show and that it relates directly to the case at hand. This means that the image must be an authentic and unaltered depiction of the scene or object, thus serving as a legitimate tool for illustrating facts or assisting in the jury's understanding of the case.

In addition, relevance is essential because the photograph must have a direct connection to the case—simply having a visually appealing or high-quality image is not sufficient if it does not contribute meaningfully to the evidence being presented in court. Meeting this standard helps ensure that the evidence is credible and aids the fact-finding mission of the court.

Other options may include specific technical qualities like artistic quality or digital format, but they do not encompass the fundamental criteria of both authenticity and pertinence that are required for photographic evidence in legal proceedings.