True or False: Only one hypothesis should remain after testing all origin hypotheses for an investigator to select it as the final hypothesis.

In fire investigation, the goal is to determine the origin and cause of a fire through the scientific method. Part of this process involves formulating multiple hypotheses regarding where the fire may have started. After assessing the available evidence, the investigator tests each hypothesis to evaluate its validity.

The correct assertion that only one hypothesis should remain after testing all origin hypotheses emphasizes the need for a single, most likely explanation based on cohesive evidence. This process helps ensure that the conclusion drawn is backed by verifiable data rather than speculation. If multiple hypotheses remain plausible after testing, it suggests that further investigation is necessary to collect more evidence or clarify ambiguous findings.

Moreover, a solid scientific approach requires that the chosen hypothesis is the most logical and provides a unified explanation for the observed facts of the fire scene. Having only one remaining hypothesis minimizes the possibility of conflicting interpretations and enhances the reliability of the conclusion reached by the investigator.