What condition must photographs meet to be considered a true representation in court?

Photographs must be relevant to the testimony to be considered a true representation in court. This relevance ensures that the images support the facts of the case and help convey information that is pertinent to the legal arguments or points being made. Photographs that do not relate directly to the issues at hand may confuse the jury or detract from the strength of the case.

While it may be beneficial for photographs to show multiple angles of the scene to provide a comprehensive view, relevance is ultimately the key aspect that determines their admissibility. Additionally, there are no strict requirements for photographs to be in black and white or to be taken by certified professionals to meet the standard of representation in court. Focus on relevance allows legal teams to use images that offer the best support for their claims.