What should an investigator prioritize when reviewing evidence?

The priority for an investigator when reviewing evidence should be a thorough and objective examination. This approach ensures that all findings are based on concrete data and facts rather than subjective opinions or personal biases. An objective evaluation allows the investigator to accurately assess the evidence, identify any patterns, and draw reliable conclusions that are critical in fire investigations.

By focusing on a comprehensive and unbiased assessment of the evidence, investigators can avoid the pitfalls of conjecture or assumptions that might arise from reliance on instincts or gut feelings. Similarly, while consultation with colleagues can sometimes provide valuable insights, it is not a substitutive method for an individual's thorough examination of the evidence. Investigators must ensure that their findings are grounded in substantiated analysis rather than simply aligning with norms or opinions. This rigorous methodology is essential for maintaining the integrity of fire investigation outcomes and upholding the standards of the field.